BULLOCK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 365 U.S. 292 (1961)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 365 U.S. 292
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/365/292/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/365/292/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
BULLOCK v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 365 U.S. 292 (1961)
365 U.S. 292 BULLOCK v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 78.
Argued January 9, 1961.
Decided February 20, 1961.
The totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing this case here, and the writ of certiorari is dismissed.
Reported below: 235 S. C. 356, 111 S. E. 2d 657.
Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. and Donald James Sampson.
Robert L. Kilgo argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Norwood Gasque.
PER CURIAM.
After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record which was only partially set forth in the petition for certiorari, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.