WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC, 364 U.S. 628 (1961)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 364 U.S. 628
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/364/628/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/364/628/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC, 364 U.S. 628 (1961)
364 U.S. 628 WORTHINGTON CORP. v. MLODOZENIEC ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 515.
Decided January 9, 1961.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: See 9 App. Div. 2d 21, 189 N. Y. S. 2d 468.
Benedict T. Mangano for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Roy Wiedersum and Gilbert M. Landy, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
COUNTY OF LAWRENCE v. UNITED STATES, 364 U.S. 628 (1961)
364 U.S. 628 COUNTY OF LAWRENCE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.
No. 528.
Decided January 9, 1961.
280 F.2d 462, affirmed.
Robert C. Lea, Jr. for appellants.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.