FTC V. TRAVELERS HEALTH ASSOCIATION, 362 U. S. 293 (1960)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 362 U. S. 293
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/362/293/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/362/293/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
FTC v. Travelers Health Association, 362 U.S. 293 (1960)
Federal Trade Commission v. Travelers Health Association
No. 51
Argued December 10, 1959
Decided March 28, 1960
362 U.S. 293
Syllabus
Respondent, a Nebraska corporation engaged in the business of selling health insurance to residents of all States, is licensed only in Nebraska and Virginia. All of its business is transacted by mail from an office in Nebraska, where policies are issued, premiums are paid, and claims are filed. A Nebraska statute prohibits unfair or deceptive practices in the insurance business there or "in any other state."
Held: as to alleged deceptive practices outside the State of Nebraska, this statute is not sufficient to bring respondent within § 2 (b) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which exempts the insurance business from the Federal Trade Commission Act to the extent that it is "regulated by State law." Pp. 362 U. S. 294-302.
(a) Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Co., 357 U. S. 560, distinguished. Pp. 362 U. S. 297-298.
(b) The state regulation which Congress provided should operate to displace the Federal Trade Commission Act means regulation by the State in which the deception is practiced and has its impact. Pp. 362 U. S. 298-302.
262 F.2d 241, judgment vacated and case remanded.