NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 361 U.S. 534
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/534/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/534/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK v. McCLOSKEY, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)
361 U.S. 534 NEW YORK EX REL. VALENTI v. McCLOSKEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 563.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 390, 160 N. E. 2d 647.
Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant.
Eliot H. Lumbard and Nathan Skolnik for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 361 U.S. 534 (1960)
361 U.S. 534 NATIONAL CAN CORP. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 564.
Decided February 23, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 220 Md. 418, 153 A. 2d 287.
Herbert M. Brune for appellant.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and John Martin Jones, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.