GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 361 U.S. 374
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/374/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/374/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
GAIR v. PECK, 361 U.S. 374 (1960)
361 U.S. 374 GAIR ET AL. v. PECK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK COUNTY.
No. 544.
Decided January 25, 1960.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 6 N. Y. 2d 97, 160 N. E. 2d 43.
Howard Hilton Spellman for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and James O. Moore, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
TAYLOR v. TAYLOR, 361 U.S. 374 (1960)
361 U.S. 374 TAYLOR v. TAYLOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 552.
Decided January 25, 1960.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 185 Kan. 324, 342 P.2d 190.
F. L. Hagaman for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.