INMAN V. BALTIMORE & OHIO R. CO., 361 U. S. 138 (1959)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 361 U. S. 138
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/138/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/361/138/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 361 U.S. 138 (1959)
Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
No. 36
Argued November 12, 1959
Decided December 14, 1959
361 U.S. 138
Syllabus
In this suit by petitioner under the Federal Employers' Liability Act to recover damages from his railroad employer for personal injuries sustained when he was struck by an automobile driven by a drunken driver while petitioner was serving as crossing watchman at a heavily traveled intersection of two city streets and three sets of railroad tracks,
Held: the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's conclusion that negligence of the railroad played a part in petitioner's injury, and a judgment for petitioner was properly reversed. Pp. 361 U. S. 138-141.
168 Ohio St. 335, 154 N.E.2d 442, affirmed.