Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/358/904/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/358/904/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSENBERG v. UNITED STATES , 358 U.S. 904 (1958)
358 U.S. 904
Joel ROSENBERG, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 451.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 8, 1958
Mr. Bernard Tompkins, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mr. Kirby W. Patterson, for the United States.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to question 1 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:
- 'I. Is the rule of this Court in Jencks v. United States, 1957, 353 U.S. 657, a rule of mere procedure, or does it involve a defendant's constitutional rights? May a clear violation of this rule be harmless error? May the conceded error of a trial court in withholding from defense counsel prior statements of principal Government witnesses be excused because a Circuit Court finds that the defense was not hampered in cross-examination of those witnesses? Is it proper for a Circuit Court to determine what use defense counsel might have made of statements erroneously withheld?'
Case transferred to the summary calendar and assigned for argument immediately following No. 471.[ Rosenberg v. United States 358 U.S. 904 (1958) ]
