CHAFFIN v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 358 U.S. 642
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/358/642/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/358/642/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CHAFFIN v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959)
358 U.S. 642 CHAFFIN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. No. 549.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Morris Lavine for appellants.
Aaron W. Reese for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA, 358 U.S. 642 (1959)
358 U.S. 642 ANDERSON v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA.
No. 576.
Decided February 24, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 327 P.2d 699.
Luther Bohanon and Leon S. Hirsh for appellant.
Ferrill Rogers, T. Murray Robinson and C. E. Barnes for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.