BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958)
Syllabus
Decided December 15, 1958.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958) 358 U.S. 205BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO
PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE
Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.
Morris Lavine for appellant.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Opinions
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408. Morris Lavine for appellant. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 358 U.S. 205, 206
U.S. Supreme Court
BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958) 358 U.S. 205 BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITYOF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408. Morris Lavine for appellant. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 358 U.S. 205, 206
Search This Case
