Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/354/393/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/354/393/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Blackburn v. Alabama, 354 U.S. 393 (1957)
Blackburn v. Alabama
No. 426
Argued May 2, 1957
Decided June 17, 1957
354 U.S. 393
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA
Syllabus
on the record in this case, it is uncertain whether petitioner's claim to protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was passed on by the State Court of Appeals, and the judgment of the Court is vacated and the cause remanded to that Court so that it may pass on that claim.
38 Ala.App. 143, 88 So.2d 199, judgment vacated and cause remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The record in this case leaves us uncertain whether petitioner's claim to the protection of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed upon by the Court of Appeals of Alabama. 38 Ala.App. 143, 88 So.2d 199. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the cause to that court in order that it may pass upon this claim. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN concur, dissenting.
Petitioner has made as strong a showing as possible that he signed the confession when he was insane. Throughout the whole proceeding, he has claimed that the confession was involuntary. The Judgment should therefore be reversed. See Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227; Leyra v. Denno, 347 U. S. 556.
