Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/348/1/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/348/1/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (1954)
In re Disbarment of Isserman
No. 5, Misc.
October Term, 1952
Decided October 14, 1954
348 U.S. 1
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Syllabus
Since a majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by Rule 8 of the present Rules of this Court, the order of disbarment, 345 U. S. 286, is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged.
PER CURIAM.
April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this Court's Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286. The order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." The petition for rehearing is granted. A majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set aside, and the rule against Isserman to show cause is discharged.
MR. JUSTICE BURTON, with whom MR. JUSTICE REED and MR. JUSTICE MINTON join, dissents for the reasons
stated in the opinion announced by Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, April 6, 1953, in In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286.
MR. JUSTICE REED also calls attention to his dissent in Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 347 U. S. 388, 347 U. S. 390.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
