WALLING V. NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RY., 330 U. S. 158 (1947)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 330 U. S. 158
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/330/158/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/330/158/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry., 330 U.S. 158 (1947)
Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway
No. 335
Argued January 17, 1947
Decided February 17, 1947
330 U.S. 158
Syllabus
1. The Wage and Hour Administrator sued to enjoin alleged violations of §§ 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, requiring that minimum wages be paid to employees covered by the Act and that appropriate records be kept concerning their employment and pay. The trial court found that, as to one group of alleged employees, the defendant railroad "for several years past has been complying with the Act as to them and apparently intends in good faith to do so in the future," and denied the injunction. That finding was not challenged here, and no argument was made here that it as not adequate to support denial of the relief granted.
Held: denial of the injunction as to this group is sustained. P. 330 U. S. 159.
2. Under facts practically identical with those involved in Walling v. Portland Terminal Co., ante, p. 330 U. S. 148, and for the reasons there stated, persons in training to become yard and main-line firemen, brakemen, and switchmen for a railroad, held not to be "employees" within the meaning of § 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. P. 330 U. S. 160.
155 F.2d 1016 affirmed.
The Wage and Hour Administrator sued to enjoin alleged violations of §§ 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 52 Stat. 1060, 1068. The District Court denied the injunction. 60 F.Supp. 1004. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 155 F.2d 1016. This Court granted certiorari. 329 U.S. 696. Affirmed., p. 330 U. S. 160.