Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/323/658/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/323/658/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Rosenman v. United States, 323 U.S. 658 (1945)
Rosenman v. United States
No. 207
Argued December 15, 1944
Decided January 29, 1945
323 U.S. 658
Syllabus
Section 319(b) of the Revenue Act of 1926, as amended by § 810(a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, provides that a claim for refund of a federal estate tax
"alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected must be presented to the Commissioner within three years next after the payment of such tax."
Held:
1. The period of limitations did not begin to run from the time of a remittance which in effect was a deposit and which the Collector placed in a suspense account to the credit of the estate. Pp. 323 U. S. 661-662.
2. As to a balance of the remittance which was applied upon a deficiency subsequently assessed by the Commissioner, a claim for refund filed within three years of such application of the balance, though more than three years from the date of the original remittance, was timely. P. 323 U. S. 661.
101 Ct.Cls. 437, 53 F.Supp. 722, reversed.
Certiorari, post, p. 691, to review a judgment denying in part a refund of federal estate taxes.
