NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. V. UNITED STATES, 316 U. S. 346 (1942)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 316 U. S. 346
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/316/346/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/316/346/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 316 U.S. 346 (1942)
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
No. 927
Argued April 29, 30, 1942
Decided May 25, 1942
316 U.S. 346
Syllabus
The Interstate Commerce Commission found that, at certain complaining markets, the railroads absorbed switching charges on competitive grain shipments (i.e., traffic originating at points served by more than one railroad), but not on noncompetitive or local traffic (originating at points served by only one railroad), while, at all other markets in central-western territory, the carriers absorbed the switching charges on both competitive and noncompetitive shipments. This practice, it found, was at variance with the general purpose of the grain rate structure to bring about
"an adjustment under which the rates to and from all western markets would be on relatively the same level, or an adjustment under which the rates to and from the markets would approximate a mileage parity,"
and was supported neither by revenue considerations nor sound transportation factors, and was unreasonable.
Held, that a cease and desist order based upon these findings was within the statutory and constitutional powers of the Commission. P. 316 U. S. 348.
41 F.Supp. 439 affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the District Court dismissing a suit to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. See 245 I.C.C. 11.