BINGAMAN V. GOLDEN EAGLE WESTERN LINES, INC., 297 U. S. 626 (1936)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 297 U. S. 626
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/297/626/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/297/626/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Bingaman v. Golden Eagle Western Lines, Inc., 297 U.S. 626 (1936)
Bingaman v. Golden Eagle Western Lines, Inc.
No. 520
Argued March 5, 1936
Decided March 30, 1936
297 U.S. 626
Syllabus
1. Upon the question whether a state gasoline tax is exacted as compensation for use of the highways or is a general excise on the use of gasoline, the construction by the state supreme court controls in a federal court. P. 297 U. S. 628.
2. Statutory provisions carried forward without material change into a new statute are continuations, and not new enactments. Posadas v. National City Bank, 296 U. S. 497. P. 297 U. S. 628.
3. As respects a carrier by motor vehicle engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, a State has no power to license and tax the importation and use of gasoline for operating the motors. P. 297 U. S. 629.
14 F.Supp. 17 affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the three-judge District Court which enjoined appellants, state officers, from enforcing certain gasoline taxes and attendant penalties.