UNITED STATES V. KESTERSON, 296 U. S. 299 (1935)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 296 U. S. 299
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/296/299/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/296/299/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Kesterson, 296 U.S. 299 (1935)
United States v. Kesterson
No. 46
Submitted November 14, 1935
Decided December 9, 1935
296 U.S. 299
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Decided upon the authority of United States v. Constantine, ante p. 296 U. S. 287.
76 F.2d 913 affirmed.
Certiorari to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926.
MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F.Supp. 680, 76 F.2d 913.
For the reasons given in the opinion in No. 40, the judgment is
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS, MR. JUSTICE STONE, and MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO's opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 296 U. S. 287.