INDUSTRIAL TRUST CO. V. UNITED STATES, 296 U. S. 220 (1935)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 296 U. S. 220
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/296/220/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/296/220/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Industrial Trust Co. v. United States, 296 U.S. 220 (1935)
Industrial Trust Co. v. United States
No. 213
Argued November 22, 1935
Decided December 9, 1935
296 U.S. 220
Syllabus
1. Acts of Congress must be construed, if possible, so as to avoid grave doubts of their constitutionality. P. 296 U. S. 221.
2. A life insurance policy taken out in 1892 by the insured and paid up in 1912 was payable to others if they survived him, but otherwise to his estate. No power was reserved in him to change beneficiaries, borrow on the policy or surrender it. The others survived him when he died in 1930. Held: that § 302(g), Revenue Act 1926, which is the same as § 402(f), Revenue Act 1918, may not be construed as making the amount receivable by the beneficiaries a part of the gross estate, notwithstanding subdivision (h) of § 302 of the 1926 Act, which declares that subdivision (g) of that section, along with others, shall apply to
"transfers, trusts, estates, interests, rights, powers, and relinquishment of powers, as severally enumerated and described therein, whether made, created, arising, existing, exercised, or relinquished before or after the enactment of this Act."
Bingham v. United States, ante, p. 296 U. S. 211. Pp. 296 U. S. 221-222.
80 Ct.Cls. 647, 9 F.Supp. 817, reversed.
Certiorari to review a judgment dismissing a petition in a suit to recover an amount exacted as part of an estate tax.