KIMEN V. ATLAS EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK, 295 U. S. 215 (1935)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 295 U. S. 215
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/295/215/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/295/215/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Kimen v. Atlas Exchange National Bank, 295 U.S. 215 (1935)
Kimen v. Atlas Exchange National Bank of Chicago
No. 662
Argued April 10, 1935
Decided April 29, 1935
295 U.S. 215
CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT,
FIRST DISTRICT, OF ILLINOIS
Syllabus
Decided upon the authority of Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank, ante p. 295 U. S. 209.
275 Ill.App. 638 affirmed.
Certiorari, 294 U.S. 703, to review the reversal of a judgment in an action for breach of the bank's contract to repurchase bonds and in general assumpsit to recover the purchase price.
MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case, which comes here on certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, is a companion case to Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank of Chicago, ante, p. 295 U. S. 209.
On November 2, 1929, petitioner purchased of respondent, a national banking association, four $1,000 mortgage bonds of the First National Company Collateral Trust. As an inducement and consideration for the purchase, the respondent agreed to repurchase the bonds at their maturity at par and accrued interest. In a suit brought by petitioner to recover for breach of the contract and in general assumpsit to recover the purchase price of the
bonds, the trial court gave judgment for petitioner, which was reversed by the Appellate Court, 275 Ill.App. 638 (opinion not reported), following its decision in Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank, supra. The Supreme Court of the state denied leave to appeal. The issues raised are the same as those in the Awotin case. For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the judgment is
Affirmed.