ABRAMS V. VAN SCHAICK, 293 U. S. 188 (1934)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 293 U. S. 188
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/293/188/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/293/188/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Abrams v. Van Schaick, 293 U.S. 188 (1934)
Abrams v. Van Schaick
No. 186
Argued November 12, 1934
Decided November 19, 1934
293 U.S. 188
Syllabus
A judgment of a state court refusing to enjoin proceedings under a state statute alleged to be unconstitutional does not present a substantial federal question when the outcome of those proceedings, if pursued, and its effect upon the federal rights asserted by the complainant, are matters of conjecture.
Appeal from 264 N.Y. 475 dismissed.
Appeal from a judgment, entered on remittitur, which reversed an injunction order of the Supreme Court of New York (150 Misc. 467) and denied the injunction.