Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/289/705/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/289/705/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY v. U.S., 289 U.S. 705 (1933)
289 U.S. 705
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY and Grace M. Wilder, petitioners,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America.
No. 691.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 8, 1933
Mr. Frank P. Doherty, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. William R. Gallagher, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioners.
Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and John R. Laying, U. S. Atty., and Sharpless Walker, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
For opinion below, see 61 F.(2d) 970.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216, 43 S. Ct. 263; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536 S., 46 S. Ct. 600; U. S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States Tariff Commission, 274 U.S. 106, 112, 47 S. Ct. 499; Railroad Commission of Texas v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223, 77 L. Ed. --.[ C. M. Patten & Company v. U.S. 289 U.S. 705 (1933) ]
Full Text of Opinion
