Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/287/314/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/287/314/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Strother v. Burnet, 287 U.S. 314 (1932)
Strother v. Burnet
No. 105
Argued November 18, 1932
Decided December 5, 1932
287 U.S. 314
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Decided in accordance with Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, ante, p. 287 U. S. 308, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties.
55 F.2d 626 affirmed.
Certiorari to review a judgment sustaining a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, 18 B.T.A. 901, which upheld a ruling of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.
The decision in this case, which is here on certiorari, turns on that in Bankers Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, ante, p. 287 U. S. 308.
Petitioner, a stockholder in the Bankers' Pocahontas Coal Co., received dividends upon his stock which were, to some extent, a distribution of the royalty payments received by the corporation and involved in its suit against the Commissioner. The ruling of the Commissioner in this case, that the amounts so distributed from royalties were taxable income was upheld by the Board of Tax Appeals, 18 B.T.A. 901, and by the Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 55 F.2d 626, which remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings, to enable the petitioner to offer additional testimony having a bearing on the correct computation of the deficiency, in accordance with the opinion of the court. The parties stipulate that the decision of this case shall be controlled by that of Bankers' Pocahontas Coal Co. v. Burnet, and the judgment below is accordingly.
Affirmed.
