DE LAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO. V. UNITED STATES, 284 U. S. 61 (1931)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 284 U. S. 61
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/284/61/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/284/61/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
De Laval Steam Turbine Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 61 (1931)
De Laval Steam Turbine Co. v. United States
No. 6
Argued October 16, 1931
Decided November 23, 1931
284 U.S. 61
Syllabus
Pursuant to the Act of June 15, 1917, empowering the President "to . . . cancel or requisition any existing or future contract for the building, production, or purchase of ships or material," the government took over by requisition the purchasers' rights in certain private contracts for the manufacture and sale of marine steam turbines. Before the contracts were performed, it cancelled them.
Held:
1. That the manufacturer was entitled to just compensation, as for property taken by eminent domain, not to damages as for breach of contract. P. 284 U. S. 70.
2. Just compensation is the value of the contracts at the time of their cancellation. P. 284 U. S. 72.
3. It does not include an allowance of anticipated profits. Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 514. Pp. 284 U. S. 70-72.
4. The fact that the contracts, if carried out, would have been profitable must be given proper weight in determining just compensation. P. 284 U. S. 70.
5. The Act cited applies expressly to contracts made before its passage. P. 284 U. S. 73.
6. Such contracts are entered into subject to future exertion of the power of eminent domain. Id.
70 Ct.Cls. 51 affirmed.
Certiorari, 283 U.S. 814, to review a judgment fixing compensation for contracts requisitioned and afterwards cancelled by the government.