MINERAL SEPARATION CORP. V. MAGMA COPPER CO., 280 U. S. 400 (1930)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 280 U. S. 400
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/280/400/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/280/400/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Mineral Separation Corp. v. Magma Copper Co., 280 U.S. 400 (1930)
Mineral Separation Corp. v. Magma Copper Co.
No. 71
Argued January 9, 1930
Decided February 24, 1930
280 U.S. 400
Syllabus
1. The effect of a patent as a disclosure depends on what is made known by the specification, and is not limited to the precise scope of the claims. P. 280 U. S. 402.
2. Patent No. 835, 120, of the Minerals Separation, Ltd. (sustained by this Court, 242 U. S. 242 U.S. 261; 250 U. S. 250 U.S. 336), disclosed the general fact that oils and other substances having a preferential affinity for the metalliferous particles in ores, can be used to separate them, in a froth, from the gangue by mixing such substances with the pulverized ore in water and agitating the mixture, the particular substance most effective with the particular ore and the limit of the quantity of it to be used being determined by preliminary tests. P. 280 U. S. 401.
3. This disclosure anticipated Patent No. 962,678, here in suit, which claims a similar process but relies on "mineral frothing agents" that dissolve in the water. The later patent cannot be sustained upon the ground that the selective substances referred to in the earlier one are oils and upon the assumption that oils function by coating the metalliferous particles and that the other substances function by "modifying the water." P. 280 U. S. 403.
4. The rule attributing weight to the commercial success of a patent as evidence of invention held inapplicable here on the special facts of the case. P. 280 U. S. 404.
30 F.2d 67 affirmed.
Certiorari, 279 U.S. 832, to review a decree of the circuit court of appeals, which reversed a decree of the district court, 23 F.2d 931, in favor of the above-named petitioner in a suit for alleged infringement of its patent.