Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/266/185/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/266/185/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Erie R. Co. v. Kirkendall, 266 U.S. 185 (1924)
Erie R. Co. v. Kirkendall
No. 51
Argued October, 1924
Decided November 17, 1924
266 U.S. 185
Syllabus
1. A petition for certiorari must give adequate information concerning the record and essential facts. P. 266 U. S. 185.
2. When the case presented upon argument differs radically from the one tendered by the petition upon which certiorari was granted, the writ will be dismissed. P. 266 U. S. 186.
Writ of certiorari dismissed.
Certiorari to a judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State of Ohio affirming a judgment recovered by the above-named respondent against the railroad for goods lost in transit.
