Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/263/611/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/263/611/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Coffee Exchange, 263 U.S. 611 (1924)
United States v. Coffee & Sugar Exchange, Inc.
No. 331
Argued November 16, 1923
Decided January 28, 1924
263 U.S. 611
Syllabus
1. Sales of a commodity, upon an exchange, under contracts calling for actual delivery in the future but which in practice are cleared by the processes called "matching" and "ringing," serve useful
and legitimate purpose, and are legal when not abused for illegal ends. P. 263 U. S. 619.
2. The fact that the facilities of such an exchange, and the influence of the prices there prevailing upon sales elsewhere, may have been used by persons, not identified, in a criminal conspiracy to cause a rise of market prices is no basis for a suit under the Anti-Trust Law to enjoin the further operation of the exchange itself and its attendant clearing house, or for a mandatory injunction to reframe their rules. P. 263 U. S. 620.
3. Provision of rules and regulations for the conduct of such exchanges to prevent future abuse by others of their lawful functions is a legislative, and not a judicial, office. P. 263 U. S. 621.
Affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court dismissing a suit for an injunction under the Anti-Trust Law.
