HALLANAN V. UNITED FUEL GAS CO., 261 U. S. 398 (1923)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 261 U. S. 398
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/261/398/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/261/398/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Co., 261 U.S. 398 (1923)
Hallanan v. United Fuel Gas Company
Nos. 570 and 886
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 12, 1923
Decided April 9, 1923
261 U.S. 398
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND IN ERROR TO
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co., ante, 261 U. S. 393.
Petition for certiorari (No. 570) denied.
Writ of error (No. 886) dismissed.
Writ of error and petition for certiorari to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, entered after the reversal of the same case by this Court in United Fuel Cas Co. v. Hallanan, 257 U. S. 277.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a case like that of Hallanan v. Eureka Pipe Line Co., ante, 261 U. S. 393, involving the question
whether the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia has complied with the mandate of this Court issued on a judgment entered in the case of United Fuel Gas Co. v. Hallanan, decided December 12, 1921, 257 U. S. 277. It is in all respects similar to that in Eureka Pipe Line Co. case, and requires the same judgment.
The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied, and the writ of error is dismissed.