ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CO. V. ARKANSAS R. COMM'N, 261 U. S. 379 (1923)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 261 U. S. 379
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/261/379/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/261/379/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. Arkansas R. Comm'n, 261 U.S. 379 (1923)
Arkansas Natural Gas Company v.
Arkansas Railroad Commission
No. 500
Argued February 21, 1923
Decided March 19, 1923
261 U.S. 379
Syllabus
1. The power of a state to abrogate private contracts touching the rates of public utilities exists only as an incident to the regulation of such utilities and their rates in the public interest. P. 261 U. S. 382.
2. A statute will be construed if possible to uphold it as constitutional. P. 261 U. S. 383.
3. A statute of Arkansas transferring to the Railroad Commission jurisdiction formerly possessed by the Corporation Commission, including pending cases, but denying power to modify or impair existing contracts for supplying natural gas, construed as not singling out a particular gas company whose claim, that divisional rates fixed by contract between it and distributors were inadequate, was pending before the latter Commission. Id.
4. An exception in a statute will not be taken as intended and operating to work an arbitrary discrimination against a particular party when it may be construed as a general one and nothing appears to prove either that there are not other cases within its purview or that it is based on arbitrary classification. P. 261 U. S. 384.
Affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court denying in part an application for a preliminary injunction.