JOHN L. WHITING -- J. J. ADAMS CO. V. BURRILL, 258 U. S. 39 (1922)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 258 U. S. 39
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/258/39/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/258/39/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
John L. Whiting -- J. J. Adams Co. v. Burrill, 258 U.S. 39 (1922)
John L. Whiting -- J. J. Adams Co. v. Burrill
No. 11
Argued January 26, 1922
Decided February 27, 1922
258 U.S. 39
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Syllabus
Decided upon the authority of Burrill v. Locomobile Co., ante, 258 U. S. 34.
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a suit like the two just decided, ante, 258 U. S. 34, to recover taxes paid under the Act of 1909 there mentioned and St.1918, c. 253. In this case, as in the other, the statutes provided a remedy that excluded an action against the Treasurer at common law. St.1909, c. 490, Pt. III, § 70; St.1918, c. 253, § 4; St.1918, c. 255, § 7. The district court gave judgment for the defendant on the merits. Without going into them, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE Pitney, being absent, took no part in the decision.