WESTERN UNION. TEL. CO. V. LOUISVILLE & N. R. CO., 258 U. S. 13 (1922)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 258 U. S. 13
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/258/13/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/258/13/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Western Union. Tel. Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 258 U.S. 13 (1922)
Western Union Telegraph Company v.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
No. 259
Argued January 4, 1922
Decided February 27, 1922
258 U.S. 13
Syllabus
A telegraph company whose line occupied part of a railroad right of way under an expired contract with the railroad company obtained a judgment under Ky.Stats. § 4679c adjudging it a right to condemn the easement and fixing the damages, which it paid into court, and, pending an appeal upon which the circuit court of appeals ordered a new trial on the right to include part of the property affected and on the damages, an act was passed (Acts 1916, c. 15) providing generally that no part of a railroad right of way should be condemned, longitudinally, for a telegraph line, and making no exception of pending cases.
Held:
(1) That the telegraph company acquired no vested right through the judgment, and its right to condemn was repealed by the later act. P. 258 U. S. 18.
(2) Kentucky Stats. § 465, declaring against construing a new law to repeal a former law as to rights accrued or claims arising under it or in any way whatever to affect any right accrued or claim arising before the new law takes effect, was inapplicable. P. 258 U. S. 19.
(3) The withdrawal of the right of condemnation violated neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the provision of the Kentucky Constitution forbidding any interference by the legislature with judicial proceedings in court. P. 258 U. S. 19.
Affirmed.
Appeal from a decree of the district court dismissing appellant's petition in condemnation. A formal appeal in this case went to the circuit court of appeals. 249 F.3d 5. In an ancillary proceeding, an injunction was granted by the district court, 201 F.9d 6, and sustained by the circuit court of appeals, but, on a subsequent appeal, that court decided that it should be dissolved because of the repealing statute here in question. See 268 F. 4, 13.