LOS ANGELES V. LOS ANGELES GAS & ELEC. CORP., 251 U. S. 32 (1919)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 251 U. S. 32
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/251/32/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/251/32/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Elec. Corp., 251 U.S. 32 (1919)
Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corporation
No. 50
Argued October 23, 1919
Decided December 8, 1919
251 U.S. 32
Syllabus
A distinction is to be drawn between the powers of a city, when acting in its governmental capacity -- i.e., the police powers -- and those which belong to it in its proprietary or quasi-private capacity. P. 251 U. S. 38.
Merely for the sake of establishing a lighting system of its own, a city has no right to displace or remove without compensation the fixtures of a lighting company already occupying the streets in virtue of rights guaranteed by its franchise. P. 251 U. S. 37.
Declarations in an ordinance to the effect that speedy establishment of a municipal lighting system, and therein the removal or relocation of poles and other fixtures maintained in the streets by the owners of other lighting systems, are necessary for the public peace, health,
and safety, do not suffice to convert such acts of interference into a legitimate exercise of police power. Pp. 251 U. S. 34, 251 U. S. 38.
A franchise to use the streets for supplying a city and it inhabitants with electric light, acquired under the California Constitution, Art. XI, § 19, before the amendment of 1911, conveys contract rights which the city is not at liberty to destroy, and the property employed in their exercise cannot be taken by the city without due process of law -- the payment of compensation. P. 251 U. S. 39. Russell v. Sebastian, 233 U. S. 195.
241 F.9d 2 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.