Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/251/108/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/251/108/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Evans v. National Bank of Savannah, 251 U.S. 108 (1919)
Evans v. National Bank of Savannah
No. 67
Argued November 11, 12, 1919
Decided December 8, 1919
251 U.S. 108
Syllabus
Whether a transaction by a national bank is usurious, and the penalties therefor, must be ascertained from the National Banking Act. P. 251 U. S. 109.
That act adopts the usury laws of the states only insofar as they severally fix the rate of interest. P. 251 U. S. 111.
Under the National Banking Act, which expressly empowers national banks to discount commercial paper and permits them to
"take, receive, reserve, and charge on any loan or discount made . . . interest at the rate allowed by the laws of the state . . . where the bank is located, and no more,"
such banks, in discounting short-time notes in the ordinary course of business, may retain an advance charge at the highest rate allowed for interest by the state law, even though such advance taking would be usurious under the state law in the cases to which it applies. P. 251 U. S. 112.
To discount, ex v termini, implies reservation of interest in advance. P. 251 U. S. 114.
21 Ga.App. 35 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
