HOUSTON V. ST. LOUIS INDEPENDENT PACKING CO., 249 U. S. 479 (1919)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 249 U. S. 479
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/249/479/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/249/479/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co., 249 U.S. 479 (1919)
Houston v. St. Louis Independent Packing Company
No. 264
Argued March 20, 1919
Decided April 14, 1919
249 U.S. 479
Syllabus
Under the Meat Inspection Act, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit the use of the word "sausage" as false and deceptive, when applied to a compound of meat, with added cereal in excess of 2 percent and added water or ice in excess of 3 percent. P. 249 U. S. 483.
The act does not require the Secretary to mark a meat food product "inspected and passed" merely because it is wholesome and free from dyes and chemicals if it is to be sold under a deceptive name. P. 249 U. S. 484.
Whether the name "sausage" is deceptive as applied to a compound of meat with added cereal and water is a question of fact which the statute submits to the determination of the Secretary, under the power it gives him to make rules and regulations for carrying it into effect, and his decision, when fairly arrived at on substantial evidence, is conclusive. Id.
242 F.3d 7 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.