CITIZENS BANK OF MICHIGAN CITY V. OPPERMAN, 249 U. S. 448 (1919)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 249 U. S. 448
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/249/448/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/249/448/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman, 249 U.S. 448 (1919)
Citizens Bank of Michigan City v. Opperman
No. 234
Argued March 17, 1919
Decided April 14, 1919
249 U.S. 448
Syllabus
When a petition for rehearing is entertained in the state court, the judgment does not become final for the purposes of review here until the petition has been denied or otherwise disposed of, and the three months' limitation prescribed by the At of September 6, 1916, begins to run from that time. P. 249 U. S. 450.
Under the Act of 1916, the review of judgments of state courts by writ of error is limited to cases in which was really drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, or the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, a state on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States. Id.
Writ of error to review 115 N.E. 55 dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.