Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/246/146/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/246/146/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Locomobile Co. v. Massachusetts, 246 U.S. 146 (1918)
Locomobile Company v. Massachusetts
No. 734
Argued October 19, 1917
Decided Mach 4, 1918
246 U.S. 146
ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF
THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS
Syllabus
An excise tax of a designated percent of entire authorized capital, imposed on a foreign corporation for the privilege of doing local business in Massachusetts, held void upon the authority of International Paper Co. v. Massachusetts, ante, 246 U. S. 135, and cases there cited.
228 Mass. 117 reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.
An excise tax of $1,300 imposed on a West Virginia corporation for doing a local business in Massachusetts during the year 1915 is here in question. The state court sustained it. 228 Mass. 117. The corporation is engaged in manufacturing in Connecticut, and sells its manufactured articles extensively in interstate commerce. It does both an interstate and a local business in Massachusetts. Each is of considerable volume, but the interstate
is much the larger, although this is not material. The tax is of a designated percent of the entire authorized capital, and was imposed after the maximum limit named in St.1909, c. 490, Part III, § 56, was removed by St.1914, c. 724, § 1. As thus changed, the statute is, in its essence and practical operation, indistinguishable from those adjudged invalid in Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 1; Pullman Co. v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 56; Ludwig v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 216 U. S. 146, and Looney v. Crane Co., 245 U. S. 178. This we have just decided in International Paper Co. v. Massachusetts, ante, 246 U. S. 135.
Judgment reversed.
