WOODWORTH V. CHESBROUGH, 244 U. S. 79 (1917)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 244 U. S. 79
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/244/79/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/244/79/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Woodworth v. Chesbrough, 244 U.S. 79 (1917)
Woodworth v. Chesbrough
No. 180
Argued April 19, 20, 1917
Decided May 21, 1917
244 U.S. 79
Syllabus
Finding a verdict and judgment excessive, the Court of Appeals gave the party who had recovered them his option to submit to a reversal or obtain an affirmance by remitting part of the judgment. The party having acted on the latter alternative, held that his cross-writ of error complaining of the reduction must be dismissed.
Cross-writ of error to review 221 F.9d 2 dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.