BAY V. MERRILL & RING LOGGING CO., 243 U. S. 40 (1917)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 243 U. S. 40
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/243/40/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/243/40/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Co., 243 U.S. 40 (1917)
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Company
No. 165
Argued January 30, 31, 1917
Decided March 6, 1917
243 U.S. 40
Syllabus
Upon a state of facts not substantially different from those presented in McCluskey v. Marysville & Northern Railway Co., ante, 243 U. S. 36, held that the defendant in error, in hauling its logs from its own timberlands over its own railroad to tidewater (origin, destination, and transit all being in the same state) for sale to others who subsequently
disposed of them or their manufactured products partly in other states, was not engaged in interstate or foreign commerce, and that the injuries suffered by the plaintiff while loading logs upon one of defendant's cars were therefore not remediable under the federal Employers' Liability Act.
220 F.2d 5 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.