HEALY V. SEA GULL SPECIALTY CO., 237 U. S. 479 (1915)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 237 U. S. 479
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/237/479/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/237/479/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Co., 237 U.S. 479 (1915)
Healy v. Sea Gull Specialty Company
No. 253
Argued May 3, 1915
Decided May 17, 1915
237 U.S. 479
Syllabus
Where it appear from the plaintiff's statement that his case is for infringement and arose under the patent laws, the district court has jurisdiction notwithstanding the fact that he may also rely upon a contract as furnishing the mode in which the damages grounded on infringement should be ascertained.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the district court in a case involving infringement of patent, are stated in the opinion.