KNOTT V. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY & COLORADO R. CO., 230 U. S. 512 (1913)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 230 U. S. 512
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/230/512/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/230/512/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado R. Co., 230 U.S. 512 (1913)
Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company
No. 347, 348
Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912
Decided June 16, 1913
230 U.S. 512
APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Syllabus
These suits having been consolidated with other similar suits disposed of by the decision in the Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 230 U. S. 474, the same disposition is made of these suits.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court. By MR. JUSTICE HUGHES.
This suit was one of the eighteen suits described in the Missouri Rate Cases, ante, p. 230 U. S. 474. Upon the hearing below, as it appeared that the property of the St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad Company had been acquired by the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, it was ordered by consent of the parties that the suits of the two companies should be consolidated, and that
the "findings, statements, and figures as to both companies" should be put "in consolidated form as those of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company."
Separate decrees were entered in the two cases, and separate appeals and cross-appeals have been taken.
The same disposition must be made of both. See Knott v. Chicago, Rock Island, and Pacific Railway Company, sub Missouri Rate Cases, note, p. 230 U. S. 474, ante. The decree below is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the bill without prejudice.
It is so ordered.