FIRST NATIONAL BANK V. LITTLEFIELD, 226 U. S. 110 (1912)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 226 U. S. 110
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/226/110/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/226/110/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
First National Bank v. Littlefield, 226 U.S. 110 (1912)
First National Bank of Princeton, Illinois v. Littlefield
No. 572
Submitted November 4, 1912
Decided December 2, 1912
226 U.S. 110
Syllabus
The settled rule is that the concurrent action of two courts below upon questions of fact will not be disturbed except in case manifest error.
In this case, appellant being claimant below had the burden of proof, and this Court will not reverse the finding of both courts that the burden was not sustained.
193 F. 24 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.