UNITED STATES V. O'BRIEN, 220 U. S. 321 (1911)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 220 U. S. 321
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/220/321/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/220/321/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. O'Brien, 220 U.S. 321 (1911)
United States v. O'Brien
No. 108
Argued March 17, 1911
Decided April 3, 1911
220 U.S. 321
Syllabus
The word "annul," as used in the contract involved in this case, construed as refusing to perform further, not to rescind or avoid.
A government contract which makes the right of the contractor to continue work under the contract depend upon the approval of the engineer in charge will not in the absence of express terms be construed as making the dissatisfaction of such engineer with progress of the work conclusive of a breach.
Where, except for the prohibition of the United States to allow the contractor to proceed, the work might have been finished within the specified period, the United States cannot claim a breach entitling it to annul the contract and hold the contractor responsible for difference in cost of completion.
163 F.1d 22 affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.