HARRIS V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, 216 U. S. 382 (1910)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 216 U. S. 382
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/216/382/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/216/382/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Harris v. First National Bank of Mt. Pleasant, 216 U.S. 382 (1910)
Harris v. First National Bank of Mt. Pleasant
No. 98
Argued January 21, 1910
Decided February 21, 1910
216 U.S. 382
Syllabus
Quaere, and not decided, whether, under § 70e of the Bankruptcy Act, the suits therein referred to can be brought in the bankruptcy court without the consent of the defendant. See contrary views expressed in Hull v. Burr, 153 F.9d 5; Hurley v. Devlin, 149 F.2d 8.
Section 70e of the Bankruptcy Act provides for avoiding transfer of the bankrupt's property which his creditors might have avoided, and for recovery of such property or its value from persons not bona fide holders for value. It does not, either with or without consent of defendant, give the bankruptcy court jurisdiction of a suit to recover property held by defendant but which, if the allegations of the complaint are true, belonged to the bankrupt and passed to the trustee.
The bankruptcy court has not jurisdiction of a suit against a bank to recover securities held by it for indebtedness of the bankrupt on the ground that the debt had been paid.
The facts are stated in the opinion.