YATES V. UTICA BANK, 206 U. S. 181 (1907)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 206 U. S. 181
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/206/181/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/206/181/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Yates v. Utica Bank, 206 U.S. 181 (1907)
Yates v. Utica Bank
No. 231-233.
Argued March 8, 11, 1907
Decided May 13, 1907
206 U.S. 181
Syllabus
Yates v. Jones National Bank, ante, p. 206 U. S. 158, followed, and held further:
That a judgment was rendered upon demurrer does not affect its cogency if it is otherwise efficacious to bring into play the presumption of the thing adjudged.
A judgment of dismissal based on the ground that plaintiff in an action against the directors of a national bank had not set up any individual wrong suffered by him but solely an injury sustained in common with all other creditors of the bank, is not res adjudicata of a right of action
between the same parties to recover for individual loss suffered, as distinct from the right of the bank.
The facts are stated in the opinion.