DOYLE V. LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCID. CO., LTD., 204 U. S. 599 (1907)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 204 U. S. 599
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/204/599/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/204/599/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Doyle v. London Guarantee & Accid. Co., Ltd., 204 U.S. 599 (1907)
Doyle v. London Guarantee and Accident Company, Limited
No. 155
Argued January 11, 1907
Decided February 25, 1907
204 U.S. 599
Syllabus
An order punishing for contempt made in the progress of the case, when not in the nature of an order in a criminal proceeding, is an interlocutory order, and to be reviewed only upon appeal from a final decree in the case.
The circuit court of appeal has no jurisdiction upon writ of error sued out by defendant from an order of the circuit court adjudging them guilty of contempt in disobeying an order for production of book and papers and also adjudging that they produce same and pay costs within a specified period or that, in default thereof, they pay a fine and be committed.
Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, followed and Matter of Christensen Engineering Co., 194 U. S. 458, distinguished.
Question certified in 134 F.1d 5 answered.
The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the circuit court of appeals to review orders in contempt, are stated in the opinion.