BACHTEL v. WILSON, 204 U.S. 42 (1907)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 204 U.S. 42
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/204/42/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/204/42/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
BACHTEL v. WILSON, 204 U.S. 42 (1907)
204 U.S. 42
CORWIN D. BACHTEL, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.
No. 447.
HARVEY H. MILLER, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.
No. 448.
WILLIAM L. DAVIS, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.
No. 449.
CHARLES H. VAN HORN, Plff. in Err.,
v.
R. FRANK WILSON, Sheriff of Stark County, Ohio.
No. 450.
Nos. 447, 448, 449, 450.
Argued November 14, 15, 1906.
Decided January 7, 1907.
Mr. William A. Lynch for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Charles C. Upham and John W. Craine for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:
The same question controls these cases as the one just decided, and, for the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, they are dismissed.[ Bachtel v. Wilson 204 U.S. 42 (1907) ]
Full Text of Opinion