Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/195/242/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/195/242/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Daly v. Elton, 195 U.S. 242 (1904)
Daly v. Elton
No. 108
Argued October 11-12, 1904
Decided November 14, 1904
195 U.S. 242
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Syllabus
Decided on authority of Dobbins Los Angeles, ante, p. 195 U. S. 223.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is practically determined by views expressed in Dobbins v. The City of Los Angeles, just decided. It was a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to discharge Daly from custody, in a prosecution under the ordinance under consideration in the Dobbins case. The prayer of the petition was denied and the writ discharged. In re Daly, 139 Cal.
216. Under the California practice, in the absence of issue joined, the allegations of the petition are taken as true. and the facts alleged therein are taken as admitted. In re Smith, 77 P 180. The petition made allegations attacking the ordinance which, if true, would render it invalid for the reasons stated in the Dobbins case, supra, and the petitioner upon the record made should have been discharged from custody.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the Supreme Court of California be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views announced in the Dobbins case, supra.
