Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/499/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/499/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Buttfield v. United States, 192 U.S. 499 (1904)
Buttfield v. United States
No. 516
Argued January 4, 1904
Decided February 23, 1904
192 U.S. 499
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED
STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Syllabus
Decided on authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan, ante, p. 192 U. S. 470.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was a proceeding for the condemnation of seven packages
of tea which had been reimported after export from this country upon a final rejection of the tea by the Board of General Appraisers as not entitled to admission into the United States for consumption under the Tea Inspection Act of March 2, 1897. Buttfield appeared as claimant, and a demurrer filed on his behalf to the information was overruled. The claimant failing to plead further, a final decree and judgment of forfeiture was entered. A reversal is asked upon the sole ground that the Act of March 2, 1897, referred to, is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. Upon the authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan, just decided, the judgment below is
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BREWER and MR. JUSTICE BROWN took no part in the decision of this case.
