JAMES V. APPEL, 192 U. S. 129 (1904)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 192 U. S. 129
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/129/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/129/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
James v. Appel, 192 U.S. 129 (1904)
James v. Appel
No. 108
Argued December 17, 1903
Decided January 4, 1904
192 U.S. 129
Syllabus
A statute copied from a similar statute of another state is generally presumed to be adopted with the construction which it already has received.
There is no unconstitutional assumption of judicial power, or anything inconsistent with the grant of common law jurisdiction to the courts of the territory, in the Legislature of Arizona enacting that motions for new trials are deemed to have been overruled if not acted upon by the end of the term at which made, the question to be subject to review by the supreme court as if the motion had been overruled by the court and exceptions reserved.
The facts are stated in the opinion.