Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/115/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/192/115/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Cronin v. Denver, 192 U.S. 115 (1904)
Cronin v. Denver
No. 101
Argued December 16, 1903
Decided January 4, 1904
192 U.S. 115
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Syllabus
Certain sections of an ordinance of the City of Denver, Colorado, as to the sale of liquor held not to be unconstitutional on the authority of Cronin v. Adams, ante, p. 192 U. S. 108.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.
This action was brought in the Police Court of the City of
Denver, State of Colorado, to collect $500, for the violation of section 746 of Ordinance No. 101 of the city. Plaintiff in error was found guilty, and fined the sum of $50. On appeal to the county court, he was also found guilty, and fined $100. The judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state, and thereupon the chief justice of the state allowed this writ of error.
The case involves the constitutionality of sections 745 and 746 of the ordinance of the City of Denver. That question was passed upon in Cronin v. Adams, just decided, ante, p. 192 U. S. 108, and on its authority the judgment is
Affirmed.
