MCLOUGHLIN V. RAPHAEL TUCK CO., 191 U. S. 267 (1903)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 191 U. S. 267
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/191/267/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/191/267/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck Co., 191 U.S. 267 (1903)
McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck Co.
No. 73
Argued November 11-12, 1903
Decided November 30, 1903
191 U.S. 267
Syllabus
The penal provisions of § 4693, Rev.Stat., as amended by the Act of March 3, 1891, had no extraterritorial operation, and did not embrace the act of affixing in a foreign country to a publication a false statement that it was copyrighted under the laws of the United States.
Prior to the amendment of March 3, 1897, there was no provision in the copyright laws forbidding the importation into, or the sale after its importation within, the United States of an article falsely stamped with the copyright notice in a foreign country and the proviso in the amending act expressly saved the right to sell such an article if it had been imported prior thereto.
The facts are stated in the opinion.