CITY OF LOUISVILLE v. BANK OF COMMERCE, 174 U.S. 428 (1899)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 174 U.S. 428
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/174/428/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/174/428/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CITY OF LOUISVILLE v. BANK OF COMMERCE, 174 U.S. 428 (1899)
174 U.S. 428
CITY OF LOUISVILLE
v.
BANK OF COMMERCE.
No. 363.
May 15, 1899
H. L. Stone, for city of Louisville.
W. S. Taylor, for Stone, auditor, and others.
James P. Helm and Helm Bruce, for Bank of Commerce.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM.
In the above case the same question is involved that has just been determined in No. 362 (19 Sup. Ct. 747), and there will be a like order reversing the judgment, and remanding the case to the circuit court, with directions to dismiss the bill.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE dissented.[ City of Louisville v. Bank of Commerce 174 U.S. 428 (1899) ]
Full Text of Opinion